When 3 Conservative right wing leaning Prime Ministers managed between them to allow the right wing media to establish a 90% domination of all printed and digital media published to the British nation and its citizens - it was effectively producing a unified 'brainwashing' operation of daily repetition.With the sole purpose of leaving a false narrative as being the 'only' narrative, politics reached almost the level of state control by way of 3 multi billionaire bodies. 1 British Lord, 1 Australian magnate, and 1 British company with no 'named' shareholders, perhaps British, perhaps Russian or Chinese?
This was a Conservative version of Democracy in 2024 - Governed by Conservatives, Media controlled by Billionaires.
In the house of commons we saw an example of how the Conservative party treats other parties and parliament itself without any respect.
This time it was the Conservative Party's turn to demonstrate its total disregard for propriety, ability to discuss political matters respectfully, descending into 'common over the fence' abuse of a neighbour..
The 'leader' of the Conservative party Kemi Badenoch delivered what could only be described as a vicious rant against the Prime Minister and the Labour party beyond all realms of decency.
The absolute bottom of the pit was when she managed to drag out a crude reference to 'paedo defenders', direct from the gutter of a Nigerian slum combined with nasty right wing politics - not worthy of a party leader . For the record 'paedo' is a slang term describing paedophilia.
1/. In order to contrast this, there was an incident in October 2020 when Labour's Deputy Leader used the words ' scum' against the Conservative party. Chris Clarkson challenged the remark (“Did the honourable lady just call me scum?”). The Deputy Speaker, Dame Eleanor Laing, immediately reprimanded Rayner for the language and Rayner apologised the next day.
2/. What followed the incident was the following from the Conservative party:
A. Public criticism and calls for an apology
Conservative MPs publicly criticised the language and said it was inappropriate. They argued it contributed to a toxic political climate.
B. Pressure that led to the apology
*On the - 'Paedo Defenders' issue: No intervention from the Speaker; no formal challenge in the chamber; media reported the remark but 'without' the same level of institutional or cross-party reaction. *No apology issued.
*On the 'Scum' issue: Immediate Intervention of the Speaker; opposition MPs objected; Media widely reported it; *Apology issued.
WHO WAS MORE ACTIVE AGAINST PAEDOPHILLIA BETWEEN 2010 - 2026
Conservative Party: 2010-2024 (14 years) Continuous (non-specified) updates to the ****** Offences Act 2003
Labour Party: 20124-2026 (2 years)
A/. Removal of limitation periods for civil claims (2025) This is a major shift: historically, survivors were often barred from seeking justice.
B/. New offences proposed under the Crime and Policing Bill (2025)
Offences relating to child abuse material, Offence of obstructing reporting, Offences relating to child criminal exploitation, Offences relating to coerced internal concealment, Offences relating to spiking.
C/. Mandatory reporting of child abuse (2025–2026)
*This is one of the most substantial changes in decades, driven by the Independent Inquiry into Child Abuse (IICSA)*
Not difficult to see who did or is now doing the most 'against' paedophilia - it appears to be that the 'Conservative party' are more guilty of 'Paedo defenders' than Labour are?