A small number of powerful private owners control most national newspapers and major online outlets. This is not illegal — but when it's disproportionately biased politically it is dangerous for our democracy and security. British citizens with different ideas and views are systematically squeezed out - which causes tension.

2. These media groups shape public perception. Not by telling people what to think, but by controlling: what stories appear, what stories don’t, who speaks first, who speaks last, what context is included, what context is removed, what tone is used, what sequence the audience hears. Simple Political Manipulation.

This is, in journalistic terms, just framing. What it is not is reporting. What this is not is news - it is views.

3. The public cannot see the full picture

Because the media: selects experts, controls interview order, uses leading questions, creates fictional hypotheticals (“if there were an election tomorrow…”), amplifies some voices, minimises others, presents opinion as fact, hides the mechanics of how narratives are built. Owing to the Freedom of Press, journalists are allowed to do this - as it is legal. When you factor in all of the above it becomes dangerous.

4. Governments of all parties allowed this to happen. Possibly not deliberately but through decades of no regulation, no transparency rules, no plurality safeguards, no accountability mechanisms - negligence.

5. The result is national risk

When the public receives distorted information, the consequences are: division, confusion, mistrust, anger, despair, social fragmentation - leading inevitably to disorder. This is a public-safety danger, not a political argument.

? THE ONLY SOLUTIONS (Simple, Clear, Non-Political)

1. Public awareness

People must understand how media framing works. Not who is right or wrong — but how the system shapes perception, traditionally by the media - but that is clearly not going to happen unless forced to.

2. Public consensus: A shared belief that: truth matters, fairness matters, transparency matters, citizens have rights, governments have duties - but how are the public to be informed about this.

This is a moral, civic, and human-rights based emergency, and up until now is an emergency being ignored!

3. Public pressure on Parliament in the absence of any political pressure

To local MP's. To leaders of all parties. On Parliament as an institution to act without delay.

The public must demand: a debate, an inquiry, a cross-party consensus, structural reform

4. Parliamentary action

MPs of all parties must: acknowledge the problem, debate it openly, agree on safeguards, legislate for plurality, transparency, and accountability

This is not about ideology. It is about democratic hygiene.

5. Support from influential citizens

Wealthy, powerful, and respected individuals must understand: this is not about politics, this is about national stability, this is about protecting future generations, this is about moral responsibility

CAMPAIGN FOR THE ABOLITION OF THE UK MEDIA TO ABUSE THEIR DOMINANT POSITION AS THE 3 LARGEST GROUPS OF DIGITAL AND PRINTED MEDIA IN THE UK WITH THEIR POLITICAL BIASED VERSION OF NEWS - GB2GB CARES - LET US SEE IF ANYONE ELSE DOES?

We produce information about the abuse of British media and the damage it creates daily to the cohesion and by destruction of unbiased news to the British Public.

Contact us here Click Here