HEADER: "PRITI'S MISSION TO SAVE CHAGOS.

SUB-HEADER: Sir Keir faces humiliation over Islands 'surrender'. This is followed with a heavily loaded story about what has 'happened' in accordance with the familiar bias on all news political stories.

This bot-style attack was given to Pritti Patel by her leader, chosen clearly for her tenacity in approach - much like her previous approach to 'staffing' etiquette when, as Home Secretary in the Conservative government, she was found that she had "bullied staff and breached the Ministerial Code, this conclusion had unfortunately been presented to the then, and now, former discredited Boris Johnson who - naturally overrode the ruling and allowed to to continue with her role.

"For the purpose of validity here are the findings regarding the behaviour of the Conservative minister, and the way they dealt with it: The official findings: The independent adviser Sir Alex Allan concluded that Pritti Patel had breached the Ministerial Code by bullying staff. The Prime Minister at the time rejected the finding, stating she had not breached the code and should remain in post. A civil service union (FDA) launched a judicial review, arguing the PM misinterpreted the rules.

This approach of the current statement by Pritti Patel about the Chagos issue was a carbon-copy of the same headlines several weeks prior to today's headlines, where the Leader of the Conservative party Kemi Badenoch made exactly the same comments, but was humiliated when the USA President changed his mind and went back to his original 'approval on the PM's Treaty - which typically in this case did 'not' include a public apology for her politically motivated attack on the PM in the first place.

Most major UK national newspapers no longer publish their daily print circulation figures. The titles that do publish numbers account for only a fraction of the total market, and the largest audited daily print figure - Metro - reaches under one million readers per day.

By highlighting just one of the many newspaper titles who collectively create this media 'brainwashing" of the British public's grip and control on what the public read daily in the UK, it is self-evident how this sets the constructed management of British media - with even more damage caused by the complimentary 'dark arts' benefits of British TV news casting several times every day - to infinitely more viewers of that rhetoric than printed news could ever achieve.

By comparison, a single primetime TV news programme routinely reaches 3–5 million viewers in one broadcast, and rolling news channels add millions more across the day. This means the broadcast platform multiplies the influence of print titles far beyond their declining physical reach.

""At the moment, this entire structural imbalance is being highlighted by one independent, self-funded 80 year old retired citizen living in Kent, working completely unpaid and without institutional or private funding to bring clarity to the public""

The UK has thousands of millionaires and billionaires who are not part of the existing media structure; it would take only one of them — or a small group — to support the creation of a non-political, public-interest media alternative to support the millions of British - political or not - citizens of the UK. He wants to know WHY HIM?

Working class or wealthy people can contribute Click Here here - if they care?